I'll do the basics:
'There are different types of reactions a person can have to foreign substances, one of which is an allergic reaction. There are also different types of allergic reactions, one of which ia an anaphylactic allergic reaction. This has something to do with the contaminant bonding with histamine, not sure of the specific action. Anaphylactic reactions are the type that typically causes death from swelling and blockage of airways. People who are deathly allergic to bees suffer this type of reaction.
The prevailing opinion is that the peptide chains in tarantula venom are physically too small to bind with the histamine and therefore cannot cause a dangerous anaphylactic reaction. Again, this is the prevailing opinion, it's not a proven fact. There are other sorts of sensitivities that a person can have to venom that could still be dangerous. There's also the possibility of secondary infection, tetanus (they carry dirt around with those fangs) and general high levels of sensitivity to certain venoms. Just because one (supposedly) cannot have a violent anaphylactic allergic reaction to a bite doesn't necessarily mean that bite is harmless.
For example, the only recorded death from a centipede bite was from a young girl who was bitten in the neck. She apparently died from suffocation when her neck swelled dramatically and blocked her airway. The venom was responsible for her death but did not directly kill her. I believe it's not outside the realm of possibility that something like this could happen if say, a P murinus or S calceatum or whatever bit a child on the face or neck.
Not comforting words, I know but those are my thoughts from the "better safe than sorry" side of the fence.
__________________
-Ethan'
You can take an Aphonopelma to crickets but you can't make it eat!