oi, ok, it seems like this is going to be a long thread - which is good
I am in the business of communication, and communication for me is a specific response to a specific input, so thanks for the responses.
I would just like to raise an issue I have on scientific vs common names. I am in agreement with all of you to use both - and in my book I do that. In fact, every species I write about I take the reader through the entire scientific classification tree. However, when I go into a pet store - and bearing in mind I had my own for 10 years - the beginner doesn't ask for a tarantula by its scientific name.
I dont buy the argument that using common names "spoils" the hobby - a red knee is a red knee and has been for as long as they have been in the pet trade, similarly chilean rose, curly hair etc.
I think going completely scientific names doesn't do the hobby a favour either because you mention the scientific name on here, and then I as a beginner use google and not much comes up, but when I enter the common name - plenty of info...anyway, this debate I sense will be like debating religion or politics...
As a beginner you should definately not be handling tarantulas, in fact, you should not be handling tarantulas full stop - in my opinion it is negligent - I dont care how experience you are, there is always that one time, and it is at that one time that the tarantula will go flying and will die as a result - so I have never advocated handling tarantulas - for me, keeping tarantulas is not about the ego trip...similarly I dont handle scorpions or venemous snakes and I dont advocate it either.
Anyway, thanks for the input - much appreciated.