Login Here

Subfusca lowland female


Rendering Error in layout Widget/Module: array_unshift(): Argument #1 ($array) must be of type array, null given. Please enable debug mode for more information.
  • Ceratogyrus
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
13 years 11 months ago #57818 by Ceratogyrus
Replied by Ceratogyrus on topic Re: Subfusca lowland female

The Magnificent Duke wrote: They are clearly both different species. The brown one is P. hindei and the orange one is P. mamillatus. I know this for a fact because the same hobbyist that resurrected P. bara told me so.


Haha. :)

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Ceratogyrus
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
13 years 11 months ago - 13 years 11 months ago #57831 by Ceratogyrus
Replied by Ceratogyrus on topic Re: Subfusca lowland female
On a more scientific note, do you have any idea why Kirk synonymised bara and subfusca, Duke?

Edit: Sorry, the obvious answer would be because they are the same species, but what characteristics was he looking at when he decided. If there was anything specific.
Last edit: 13 years 11 months ago by Ceratogyrus.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 11 months ago #57833 by That Cossor guy
He does not mention any specific characters only that it was essentially a very large female of P. subfusca. However, before that he does say that the only stable features in the genus are the ventral leg markings as the spermathecae are to primative and the palpal bulb & stridulating organs show variation even within a species. So I can only assume that the leg markings were one of the main deciding factors.



Want to know a lot more about tarantulas? Then click ME
Want to be a tarantula geek? Then click ME

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Ceratogyrus
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
13 years 11 months ago #57834 by Ceratogyrus
Replied by Ceratogyrus on topic Re: Subfusca lowland female
Ok, that's what I assumed (The leg patterns)
Thanks. :)

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 11 months ago - 13 years 11 months ago #57836 by Dimitri Kambas
So that now raises even more questions of how you can decide (describe) with just leg patterns right? Most say that colour is not enough on its own then how is a leg pattern good enough? Hmmm interesting take on this topic.

Edit: How did the first two get described on what details?
Last edit: 13 years 11 months ago by Dimitri Kambas.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Ceratogyrus
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
13 years 11 months ago #57837 by Ceratogyrus
Replied by Ceratogyrus on topic Re: Subfusca lowland female

Dimitri wrote: So that now raises even more questions of how you can decide (describe) with just leg patterns right? Most say that colour is not enough on its own then how is a leg pattern good enough? Hmmm interesting take on this topic.

The Magnificent Duke wrote: He does not mention any specific characters only that it was essentially a very large female of P. subfusca. However, before that he does say that the only stable features in the genus are the ventral leg markings as the spermathecae are to primative and the palpal bulb & stridulating organs show variation even within a species. So I can only assume that the leg markings were one of the main deciding factors.


If that's the only defining characteristics and separates all the other species, then I don't see why it's not good enough.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.734 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum